Comparison · for a company documenting itself

A consent or policy tool compared with the documentation a customer asks for

A cookie banner and a generated website policy answer what your website owes its visitors. When an enterprise customer asks for a DPA, a sub-processor list and a security questionnaire, they are asking about the processing behind your product. The two sit side by side.

Serving other organisations rather than your own? The same comparison for a practice.

	clausebench	A consent or policy tool
The question answered	What your company owes its customers and their regulators	What your website owes its visitors
What comes out	DPA and schedules, record of processing, retention schedule, sub-processor list, trust page, questionnaire answers	A cookie banner and a website privacy notice
Scope of the facts	Your whole processing: staff, customers, vendors, transfers	What runs on the website
Who reads it	Your customer's legal and security team	Your website's visitors
When the other is what you need	—	You need a compliant banner and a public notice on a site, and nobody is asking you for a DPA

Which one suits you

Choose clausebench if

You answer for organisations other than your own
You produce documentation, not banners

Choose A consent or policy tool if

You need a banner and a policy for one site
There is nobody else's paperwork to keep

Descriptions of other products reflect their public positioning at the time of writing. Check their current offering before deciding.

See what changed since your clients' policies were written

Enter up to ten client websites. Free, no sign-up, the first report in about a minute.

Scan your clients' websites or start a free trial →